Space Engineers 2 Weekly Release: Locker & Hydrogen Thruster Particle Effects

    Diese Seite verwendet Cookies. Durch die Nutzung unserer Seite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies setzen. Weitere Informationen

    • Space Engineers 2 Weekly Release: Locker & Hydrogen Thruster Particle Effects

      Neu

      Space Engineers 2 News-Hub schrieb:

      Hello, Engineers!

      This week’s release brings fresh style to your builds with a brand-new decorative block and some visual upgrades to existing ones!

      A decorative Locker block is now available, offering a realistic touch for interior spaces with storage areas. It’s ideal for hinting at high-value gear inside!
      The Hydrogen Thruster has received a visual upgrade, with improved flame particle effects that bring more intensity and motion to your ships.
      Additionally, the Shower block got a polish! It now looks smoother and fits seamlessly into your creations.

      As always, all blocks and improvements are available now!

      This week we spent time discussing what combat should look and feel like in Space Engineers 2. Nothing is final yet. We're exploring ideas, identifying the pain points from SE1, and trying to define what kind of combat experience we actually want to build.

      What are we aiming for?

      We started by outlining a few core principles that we think should guide combat design in SE2:

      • Longer, more tactical engagements: Fights should take time - measured in minutes, not seconds. We want to avoid sudden one-shot kills and give players time to react.

      • Preparation should matter: Players who scout, build defenses, or prepare ambushes should be able to generate unfair local advantages.

      • Rock-Paper-Scissors balance: No single weapon or strategy should dominate. A system where different combat types counter each other could make battles more dynamic.

      • Player feedback and clarity: You should know when you’ve hit something, what damage you’re doing, and what’s happening around you - without guesswork.

      • Support both attack and defense playstyles: Offensive and defensive roles should both be viable, with tools and mechanics that support each side.

      With those principles in mind, we discussed possible features and mechanics that could support this kind of gameplay.

      Combat Duration & Survivability

      In SE1, a single cockpit hit could end the fight instantly. We’re thinking about ways to prevent this - possibly through shields or other durability layers that give players more time to react. The idea isn’t to make combat slower for the sake of it, but to make it more interesting and fair.

      Weapon Dynamics: Rock–Paper–Scissors

      We explored a triangle-based balance model:

      • Aimed/manual weapons beat automated turrets

      • Automated turrets beat rockets/missiles

      • Rockets/missiles beat aimed weapons

      This would encourage diverse ship builds and make strategic choices more meaningful, especially in PvP.

      Detection, Infiltration & Defense

      We’d like players to have ways to detect enemies - not just through visual spotting but via tools like scanners or sensors. This also opens up infiltration gameplay, where a player could sneak into an enemy base or ship and gain an advantage. But for that to work, defenders need countermeasures - like surveillance systems, detection blocks, or hacking protection.

      We’re also toying with the idea of hacking encounters as a mini-game or high-stakes mechanic during infiltration.

      Safe Zones & Risk Management

      Safe zones came up a lot. We’re considering making them:

      • Limited in size and availability

      • Costly to maintain over time

      • Slow to set up

      The idea is to preserve tension and avoid scenarios where players are untouchable. One suggestion was to have safe zone chips decay over time, even when stored, to prevent stockpiling. There could also be progression systems that allow players to expand their safe zones later in the game.

      Character vs Grid Combat

      Another angle we’re still thinking about: how important should character combat be compared to grid combat? Should it play more like a shooter, or more like an engineering-driven encounter? Some ideas we’re toying with:

      • Characters boarding grids and taking them over

      • Combat-focused suit upgrades

      • Dedicated tools for sabotage or infiltration

      There’s also potential to make enemy characters more visible or tagged on your HUD if they’re hostile - not allied - making encounters easier to track and respond to.

      As always, these are early design discussions. Some of these systems may evolve, combine, or be cut entirely. But this is the direction we’re thinking about as we continue shaping SE2 into the game we’ve always wanted to play.

      Let us know what you think combat in SE2 should feel like!


      Please join us for Space Engineers 2 Developer Livestream!

      Image Credits: Generations by Bash


      ️ Feedback & Support - https://support.keenswh.com/
      ️ Roadmap: https://2.spaceengineersgame.com/roadmap-2/#current
      ️ Discord: https://discord.gg/keenswh
      Newsletter: https://www.keenswh.com/newsletter
      ➡️ Connect and find us on your platform of choice: https://www.keenswh.com/connect/


      https://steamcommunity.com/games/1133870/announcements/detail/512962085601152445https://steamcommunity.com/games/1133870/announcements/detail/822583385779083263https://steamcommunity.com/games/1133870/announcements/detail/512962085601150070

      Quelle: store.steampowered.com/news/ap…0/view/512962085601153398